i just safely assume we have been on this planet for longer than they could say from things they find cause what about the things they will never be able to find!
300,000-year-old skulls could rewrite the human origin storyhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/skulls-found-morocco-human-origins-discover-archaeology-a8047906.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It'd been fascinating watching the years slowly increase. 150,000 to 200,000 then 250,000. We keep getting older.
-
We are are as young as the universe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe it's by looking at how many half lives the carbon has gone through
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You saw it in half and see how many rings it has
-
It's a dating technique based on level of radioactive isotopes remaining in the flint heads. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-0415-2_6 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If it’s good enough for dolphins then surely it’s good enough for apes
pic.twitter.com/R7H3VewPaE
End of conversation
-
-
-
True
-
Carbon can't be used to reliably date samples significantly older than 50,000 years due to its relatively short half-life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.