Thank god. Thanks for using your platform to shine a light on this! Lawyers don't have too many wanting to bat for us.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aren’t (practicing) lawyers already bound to uphold the constitution, and doesn’t the constitution already mention those values?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Requirement seems “benign” but the minds planning to use it are terminally malignant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh boy. 140 characters are not enough to express how and why this ticks me off. This requirement is absolute insanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Forcing someone to say they believe something is useless/bad. But funny how you ALWAYS find ways to be anti-liberal, never anti-conservativepic.twitter.com/96364G8McX
-
I mean it's almost like you are not really a free-speech principle activist but really the same old reactionary dishonest hypocrite, hmmm...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When one refers to something as "benign," yet states it is necessary they are LYING! This is
#sinister, to say the least.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hitler started out being kind as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what happens when you have too many lawyers (liberal arts) and people that produce no value. They find ways of "legally" stealing it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doesn't "radicalized" really just mean non-Progressive?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.