Anti-natalism sounds like the weirdest position ever, How can you "prefer" non-existence when you have to exist to prefer anything?
Of course, it matters how you measure the bad and good. But that can be gerrymandered at will.https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/922482531403931649 …
-
-
-
You can't know what is is to exist or prefer without existing in the first place, you can desire to STOP existing but to NOT exist?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
but I thought evil doesn't exist and morality is arbitrary according to secular knowledge?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1. Crush your enemies 2. See them driven before you 3. Hear the lamentation of their women
-
Ha, made me get soda up my nose you magnificent bastard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It might also be worth noting that we can influence how much good there is in this existence. My life is way better than my ancestors’.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who decided life should be good more than bad? Logically does an increase of ‘good’ decrease the significance of ‘good’? Supply & Demand 101
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I could argue that it is more moral to wildly and randomly procreate, like a bunch of Viking Raiders - a monte carlo method
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not that his essay is entirely rational, but this kind of argument is maybe the best example of how rationality alone is a nebulous nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.