What about bovine flatulence?
So it turns out that it was scientists who were sensitive to atmospheric CO2 level increases? http://notrickszone.com/2017/10/16/recent-co2-climate-sensitivity-estimates-continue-trending-towards-zero/#sthash.qyhCHmbR.ScfPjAlg.dpbs …https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/920414051099742208 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If there's one truth to the field of science, it's that scientists, despite the usually wholly pedestrian work they do, want to be famous
-
Everyone wants to be Einstein, and fancy themselves as the next one as they change out the pump oil on the SEM.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would like link to the full paper, Scafetta is well known for fudging and cherry-picking to refute climate change, and even he can't deny it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AGW will fall apart over next 10 years, but it won't matter. No one will apologize or lose credibility; they'll just find a new hysteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh Mann oh Mann oh Mann!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We're playing with fire now, aren't we?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Climate scientists are extremely sensitive to the flow of money that maintains their ideology.
-
Lmao glad you can confirm hundreds of scientists from 37 different atmospheric research groups all joined the same "church"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.