-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is "leftist utopian 20th century intellectuals" the euphemism we're on now?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
George Bernard Shaw was a prime example of how IQ isn't a determinant for righteousness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The 19th cent., conservative, bourgeois, romantic, was the most creative ever. The 20th, grotesque, murderous, progressive, was its reaction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So it's impossible to be a right-leaning (conservative) irreligious anti-statist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think the categories are at all useful (except as pejoratives for people invested in one side) so I don't answer to them. But...
-
Christianity doesn't have an epistemology for me to object to anymore than it has a coherent physics. It's the traditions I find of value.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Being Popperian, ultimate sources don't concern me. The traditions are (Judeo)-Christian, instantiated in those religions & practised there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(Does the physics I do "really come from Newton"? Doesn't matter. It's *Newtonian* physics. We agree what that means and it works).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Misconception is the usual state of things. It's no sin. You need to accept that people actually think the superstitions are true and...
-
a far greater number find the moral injunctions true as well. Newtonian physics, we must remember, is false. But very useful!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.