Jordan, I'm not sure the article actually contradicted Damore's points. It seems to attack things he didn't mention.
Hence the need for effective programs to overcome unconscious biases.https://www.wired.com/story/what-james-damore-got-wrong-about-gender-bias-in-computer-science …
-
-
-
If you've read any of the critical articles, that is the entire point. Damore's points ignored very important social context.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If only we could just make everyone think exactly the same about everything!
-
Everyone who doesn't gets to take a shower...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Professor, there is not a single actual rebuttal to Damore's points in this Wired piece.
-
It starts with ' we know ' that's not an argument.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure if "programs" can be effective in changing deep seated moral behaviour. Such attempts are utopian & doomed to failure, eventually.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TLDR: Because we need it, "common sense" with anecdotal after-thought, correlation, and words harm. None in CS should pretend to know humans
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can anyone find the most recent numbers? Even with diversity programs in place is it realistic to hit 50%?pic.twitter.com/0bJV8mXzQF
-
Only through reducing male numbers, which will be the next step
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.