Which is not to say the world wouldn't be a better place if we all spent considerably less time on Twitter.
12 whole voters? The NY Times social science savvy matches its journalistic integrity...https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/902772626824859648 …
-
-
-
Teach, serve, and remember something wonderful while we're here is my approach.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let's sample a preschool on what's for dinner. Oh, chocolate syrup and gummi bears. Again.pic.twitter.com/jvzVhYjkil
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
After talking to 12 people they don't see eye to eye with they gave up and spun this article as they wanted because they didn't agree fully
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
all they could scrape up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why so spiteful, Jordan? Not a good quality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
" One man said the country was “more divisive” now than it has been since the Civil War." They got some real Einsteins in there too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
12 is a magic number...Jesus' apostles and all that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
12 is fine for an in depth qualitative analysis looking at people's sense making, as long as you don't: generalise or exaggerate claims
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's called a "focus group" for a reason. You are much better than this, Dr. Peterson.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.