-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meh; Anon = Anon; anonymous speech lacks credibility, without corroborating evidence. Ergo, you can rant, but your rant better have validity
-
Consider above a base mode, unless you haven't the capacity to parse an argument.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please sir, consider Footy has 14 followers. May I suggest 'eagles don't catch flies' fyi threading guide:https://twitter.com/mwiik/status/870301784627138561 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's great; No one is arguing against free speech, only that said statements were either poorly thought out or intentionally misleading.
-
As such, doing so from behind a mask shows a knowledge of one's own ideas lack of substance, or their somewhat slanderous nature.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel it's roughly being implied: "if you're going to attack, do it like a gender!". :) More "spice" than argument at that point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That part I disagree with. There is nothing wrong with keeping your anonymity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.