I'd not heard of this, Dr. Peterson. Disgusting! So others can follow, here's archived article. http://archive.is/LnMzF Key paragraph:pic.twitter.com/Iq8gw2AHvA
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'd not heard of this, Dr. Peterson. Disgusting! So others can follow, here's archived article. http://archive.is/LnMzF Key paragraph:pic.twitter.com/Iq8gw2AHvA
Reading this thread, I saw reference to a "correction." Article notes NO correction. No apology. Just changed language, pretending no issue!pic.twitter.com/MmuYGq2DbG
Absent a separate article in which @SteveKovach explains how he got this wrote & offers abject apology, you should sue for punitive damages.
Because this isn't journalism. This is a guy using who used a publishing platform to tar an ideological competitor who he detests. /1
This is akin to Amway falsely suggesting that Proctor & Gamble is a Satanist company. That cost big $$. http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/03/20/procter-gamble-awarded-125-million-in-satanism-lawsuit.html … /2
Dr. Peterson isn't a public official. He's private citizen, and a liberal scholar. Calling him a "far-right figure" is LIBEL PER SE. /3
This is the modern-day equivalent of publishing a newspaper editorial in 1900 calling a respectable married woman a "whore." /4
In a case like this (false light & libel per se against a private individual). society imposes punitive damages to deter such abuse. /5
If only everyone with a public voice was as clear, articulate and accurate as you. Thanks for calling a lazy professional to task.
In this video you describe the nationalist tendencies of the 'alt right' as "necessary" and "benevolent"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fInko6WL9No …
Nationalism is the core of the far right thinking, is it not? You say the alt right is "incomplete", but not, you know, "wrong"
You also criticise it's tendency to anti-semitism, but not it's misogyny or racism towards other groups. Are we to infer those are ok?
Western European far right (e.g. Geert Wilders) distances itself from anti-Semitism, but has found other targets. How are you different?
In this video, you describe white people as being "targeted" on the basis of ethnicity and compare them to kulakshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZK9h_Mzmu8 …
This group systematically murdered under USSR. Why the over-the-top comparison? Echos "white genocide" mythology beloved of far right
Never having heard of you before, when I saw these videos, you struck me as a far right figure. Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc
That's admittedly a first impression. Would love a pointer to you explicitly denouncing white nationalism, if you've made one.
Yes, they couldn't possibly admit you actualy had an idea- so they labeled you with a direction rather than a position
Bless You! Stand Up For Your Good Name! Stand Up To Marxist Propaganda!
I think one of the problems that occurs with the media that people prefer to be told what to think, so the media...
becomes the authority. I have seen it with people that I know. In my interactions with them, it seems more to do with ...
people wanting information quickly from an "authority," when it comes from inexperienced observer. The news becomes the...
telephone game.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.