Dr Jordan B Peterson on Twitter: "Note: "Excluding romance." Fraud = predefining exclusion criteria that will produce results supporting your hypothesis.… https://t.co/9UcHcfhqxk"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

1. Richard Barnes‏ @liberty_ninja 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  @jordanbpeterson have you seen this?https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/neejzq/this-cafe-is-charging-men-18-more-to-reflect-the-gender-pay-gap?utm_source=vicecanadafbca&utm_campaign=global …
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Frederick Alistar‏ @freddyalistar 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Idk if fraud is the right word when they are up front about it. Flawed/biased analysis certainly
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Digital Assassin‏ @Digital_Ass 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  @existentialcoms Irrelevant - there's no such thing as men and women.
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Lasse Skou Lindstad‏ @LSLINDSTAD 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Lasse Skou Lindstad Retweeted Existential Comics
  
  He included the graph with romance as well:https://twitter.com/existentialcoms/status/895422154702954496 …
  
  Lasse Skou Lindstad added,
  
  Existential Comics @existentialcoms
  
  Replying to @existentialcoms
  
  Here is the chart with romance included, for the people who thought I was doing some kind of bamboozle: pic.twitter.com/GESOmQ2PEy
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Koogs (3,3)‏ @KoogTrades 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  But wouldn't adding romance perpetuate gender stereotypes? LOL.....
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Cyrano's Nose ‏ @pwndbyagirl 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  The trend seems to be moving towards parity.. which is a good thing, no?
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Marcel Weiher ‏ @mpweiher 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  “When you exclude movies targeting women and starring women, there are not that many women starring in movies.” Impressive.
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Vladi_Do not click my DMs‏ @el_otro_vladi 10 Aug 2017
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Exclude "bromance" too, so at least we have a somewhat level field
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Lasse Skou Lindstad‏ @LSLINDSTAD 10 Aug 2017
  no idea dude
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Cyrano's Nose ‏ @pwndbyagirl 10 Aug 2017
  It just "is."
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo