... and that's from the folks professing to stand up for our civil liberties? Yikes.
That's because "who defines hateful feelings?" That's not a question, with regard to free speech. It's THE question.https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/895324334687870976 …
-
-
-
What they are saying is that "hate speech" is allowable aka protected. At least in the US. Bye Canada :(
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Our very own hate laws in the Criminal Code of Canada have no legal definition for hate. It is literally the law running blind.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The devil, as usual, is in the details ... just 'who' are these mysterious arbiters of our 'feelings'?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In Canada we have no such protection. Our flawed Constitution lets judges and politically-appointed "Human Rights" Commissars limit speech.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm afraid any failure to kowtow to leftist dogma is a breach of Article 58. I will be detaining those children under Sections 1, 11 and 12.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.