I assume the Ministry of Truth will be deciding what is and is not hate speech?
Amendment re Bill C16 that the Justice Minister has now publicly refused to consider. Why? Because it's not part of the agenda.pic.twitter.com/X5VpeZp7ql
-
-
@themfryingfish's account is temporarily unavailable because it violates the Twitter Media Policy. Learn moreThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet they INSIST no one will be held criminally responsible for misgendering. If it's no 'big deal' then why not put those 2 clauses in?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Political Correctness, to me, is like this story... https://youtu.be/mmcCmjhO8KQ?t=7m44s …
-
It started off flawed in principle, but noble in intent, and grew into a religion that now subjugates any who don't submit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Those clauses provide full license to weaponize speech, regardless of *context.* Harassment? Perfectly OK! Don't like it? Quit / Leave.
#C16 -
wtf do you mean by "weaponized speech"? Women, Black people etc. had "weaponized speech" that's how they got their rights. Seriously dude.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
OTOH, as it is,
#C16 doesn't address speech -- only obvious discrimination like harassment. *Context* matters.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Show me the preachers persecuted for condemning LGBTQ people. Show me the people punished for using "Mrs." instead of "Ms."
#C16Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.