Paragraph two is at completely at odds with the rest of the statement.
Oh, that's why: The underrepresentation of women is due to the low number being nominated by universities. http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/media-medias/releases-communiques/2017/equity-equite-eng.aspx …
-
-
-
You're right. Paragraph 2 makes sense. Then they contradict it with everything else. We have gone down the rabbit hole Alice.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If they do this use it against them sue for diversity of thought in universities
-
And lose . They run the courts as well
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gender is supposed to be a social construct so it shouldn't matter who/what gets nominated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No words...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.