its not.
We pay people to be productive for society's sake, not as a reward for who they are. How is rejecting the most qualified a good thing?https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/860360153916256256 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What* they are
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is as it appears The dismantling of our functional society into a Marxian zootopia.key formula is always rights of minority over majority
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is driven by
#climate change. Obviously.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because the answer doesn't matter as long as 2 + 2 feel good about themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this happens, then we would have possibly unqualified individuals doing jobs they shouldn't be doing just for diversity's sake.
-
Which would lead to more errors in the work done, even more so if those individuals are toxic ideologues. The same reasons you hire someone
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because: Feeeellinnggs, whoa, whoa, whoa, feeelllings.
-
most of your audience wasn't even born when this came out: https://youtu.be/Xwz5Tc5iT-w
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.