It always is.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the independent saying that it was for laughing is a prime example of why people dont trust news outlets anymore. wish theyd just cut the bs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GJ Prof. Peterson dont beleive the MSM they are after revinue not the truth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they were dragging her out because she laughed, right? I'd be a bit upset about that as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fine to criticize outlets for inaccurate reports, but not in defense of Trump, who is most galling political liar I (or you) have ever seen
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Act like an adult and no issue arises. Anyone who fake laughs twice ... annoying enough to get the chair. ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That doesn't seem especially complicated, and to my eye, eerily familiar.pic.twitter.com/VDPvU6r5od
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Being visible doesn't mean you're disrupting. Totally reasonable that she wanted to stand out without intention of impeding the hearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They were let in in their outfits, and they weren't be ejected for what they were wearing. She laughed. Officer could have shushed her.
-
Whole reason for initial attempt to eject her is baseless. She shouldn't be blamed for then objecting to her ejection - even if disruptive
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.