People keep getting this wrong..someone should screenshot the relevant passages, show the connections with red arrows on sth, etc
Read the policies associated with it. They clearly state that failure to use a preferred pronoun is harassment.https://twitter.com/kalerob22/status/858539530051309569 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amazing how the people not hurt by the bill want to tell you how much the bill doesn't hurt...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Give the bill a read." -someone who clearly doesn't understand the gravity of said bill
-
And that the effect of a law has to be considered: if there is hair-splitting redifinition of what is legal, it must be made explicit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Notice he gets Peterson's name wrong. Honest slip or harassment worthy of legal action? /s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Preferred pronouns are utter crap as they are third person, when talking to them you would always use "you" anyway
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this has all gone too far, theres a limit to this kind of bullshit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get ur argument abt being forced to say something. But do you not see value in calling ppl by their pronoun & that its worth infringement?
-
He has stated he would acquiesce if asked. The problem is that legislating human interaction is inherently fallacious, and disingenuous.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
May I suggest your team create an infographic supporting your argument and pointing out how the policies are connected :)
#MakeItViralThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.