And this isn't even hard to understand, given the average personality differences.
Time to pay a bit more attention to the research side of things, I guess.https://twitter.com/NatureNews/status/854304784530247680 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Choices, choices, choices!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thats good ammunition against the bloody "leaky pipeline" argument of why women drop out at a higher rate on the career path in academia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quite unreadable as presented.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Women are more social and generally enjoy teaching more tho and they tend to be better at it too :D Except Professor Peterson :D
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Geez, what a chauvinist..who cares what the data says.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@liebermaninfo Q: Any high quality social science data exist that would explain such a finding? A:YES!...and it ain't from gender studies!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nature News comments? Marxist bullshit. No comments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i dont get this, is teaching and social outreach rated not as valuable since women are already above in it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.