We have to analyze the negative correlations, with the positive correlations and compare these facts together to come to a solid aggregate.
That problem has burdened the world's greatest philosophers. But YOU know the answer! It's so simple, after all. Anyone can see it...https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/852361486492217344 …
-
-
-
Looking at variables and degrees of statistics is only one layer to the onion in which we peel back to reveal other variables.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
Full "article" here: http://www.pcr-rcp.ca/en/archives/1959 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Assuming everyone tells the truth..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Cernovich Confirmation bias is a cancer to a persons ability to ReasonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess relativism is something he has in common with his Marxist advisories?
-
It's not relativism simply because the limiting factors are innumerable. Things that can benefit human beings are limited, and not relative.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have many philosophers been stuck on the specific problem: How do we make the subconscious rational. ...!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correction: sufficiently true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.