![∃𝑋[∅∈𝑋∧∀𝑦(𝑦∈𝑋⇒𝑦∪{𝑦}∈𝑋)]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/976278603989168129/5nzgS7j4_normal.jpg)
1/3 There is validity to the relativist claims of postm. knowledge IS contextual.
From @DylanBJohnson: "not sure how to square Jordan's anti-postmodernism with his redefining of truth"... I'm not SURE either.
-
-
-
What makes the relativist claims of post modernism valid?
@jordanbpeterson @DylanBJohnson - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
2/3 Where they go wrong is concluding that all truths are equal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3/3 Some claims are more inclusive, precise and comprehensive than others
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Enjoy your material but having difficulty reconciling your stance on post modernism w/ your stance on truth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutism, like relativism, necessarily leads to a fictionalist conception of truth.
@jordanbpeterson @DylanBJohnsonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The truth of a set of axioms are defined by "fitness" of generated system. Postmodernism's axioms arent true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time is a necessary factor in determining the fitness of post-mod in a pragmatic sense
-
@nntaleb Post-mod presups are fragile, only exist secondarily to excesses of western modernity
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just because knowledge is contextual doesn't mean it isn't real knowledge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.