@SamHarrisOrg Is it not possible that science can jump that Darwinian layer and see ultimate truths about reality?
There is reality. Then there is Darwinian competition to approximate that reality. Science is nested inside that.
-
-
-
still subject to evolved the human condition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg Is this not the basic argument between Aristotelian and Platonian metaphysics?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Mfw7kqVU-U&t=4498s …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the former cannot be made intelligible with the acceptance of the latter. Not being able to stand outside our darwinian...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
framework means not being able to talk meaningfully about a 'truth' independant of it. That's an important pragmatist point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trial and error method of science systematically corrects for our evolved biases over time.
@jordanbpeterson -
Guess, / trial (the truth of the guess) might be more accurate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Does reality make itself known to man, or is it inert, impervious to our attempts to comprehend it? (1/2)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If so, then Darwinian accounts of epistemology, as those of biology, are necessarily incomplete. (2/2)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.