you make very strong case for religion.and I thought you and @SamHarrisOrg should agree more on human consciousness atleast
It was hard to proceed past our essentially different ontological/epistemological presuppositions. And no wonder. It's a difficult topic.https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/822838906718601216 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg you might find some benefit in reading analytic philosophy, Jordan.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg yet it's the most important thing two humans can discuss. Difficult, yes, but essential. Thank you Jordan.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most disagreement I've heard on Sams podcast which is by no means a bad thing, do hope you will both speak again regardless
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I honestly don't care much to be convinced one way or another. It's just great to hear to great minds discuss great issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SamHarrisOrg I think scientific truth is like the one element of culture (-) and religious truth is the other element (+) -
like P. says, culture is tyrannical (truth) but that view is not true enough - the other side is just as true
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'll argue that it *merely confuses things* to take the word 'truth' and try to force the notions of 'newtonian' and..
-
..'darwinian' truth into battle over which one gets to carry the unqualified label of 'truth'. You could instead have..
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.