if you give the people the ability to limit free speech, they will inevitably kill Socrates.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you define limits, people will redefine non-qualifying act to meet those limits. Like misgendering equating violence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the same with surveillance. Those powers seem to surrendered rarely once given or taken.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
giving one side the right to limit the rights of the other side, what could go wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
just watched it. Interestingly most of it is about Canadians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't it important for people to "play the same game" on some level in order for civilization to negotiate with itself?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you silence people by law rather than by argument and facts, you lose the argument altogether.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@65ishot every single timeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
truth
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
stand up for free speech
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.