Heeere we go. As if on cue.pic.twitter.com/EzPyosJXIK
Groups do not suffer. Individuals suffer. For that reason, the group does not truly exist.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
"That which suffers" isn't a complete definition of "that which exists". This is a very glib thing to say.
-
Good point. On the other hand, a charitable reading is that the group is not a morally significant entity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think this is sufficient cause to believe the group doesn't exist. Why ever refer to anything as a group then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think
@jordanbpeterson is coming from Jung's individuation.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Youre good at twitter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
oops, responded to the wrong tweet, let me try that again lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reminded me of Ayn Rand saying how there is no collective stomach to feed, but only individual needs to be met.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would delete this remark if I were you. It makes you look like a heartless cunt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.