If basic needs are being met (absolute, not relative to others), they have something to lose.
Too much inequality destabilizes society, as those at the bottom have nothing to lose. But how to control the dread Pareto Distribution?https://twitter.com/JiMannering/status/814349496368955392 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But
@jordanbpeterson, surely "having nothing to lose" is a function of having nothing (ie poverty) rather than inequality?@JiMannering -
that is absolute poverty. Of course income inequality impacts negatively on top and bottom.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@JiMannering is it inequality or lack of mobility? It seems like the "lack of mobility" rhetoric is what destabilizesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sounds like another volunteer for the political re-education camp to me!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JiMannering Read "the Spirit Level Delusion" by@cjsnowdon to see that most of the correlation based on cherry picking -
based on his previous offerings I'll give it a miss thanks.https://www.amazon.co.uk/d/Books/Velvet-Glove-Iron-Fist-Christopher-John-Snowdon/0956226507 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To solve Pareto effect, merely identify those with excess talent & thru incentives/coercion goad them to mate with dullards
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.