Dr Jordan B Peterson on Twitter: "Peer-review, of itself, means nothing. Which peers? What's the method of inquiry? But if you believe in truth by consensus, it's sufficient.… https://t.co/cMd7cj6Ucu"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

1. humpty dumpty‏ @dumpty035 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  @pammustard The truth exists. Lies are made up. Salvador dali
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. BrutallyHonestOne‏ @ShawnskiOne 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Ahhh yes, modern day peer reviewingpic.twitter.com/QDUVo6GKMl
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. William Gaines‏ @WilliamFGaines 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  True that. A bunch of addicts agreeing on the efficacy of a "brand" of heroin is peer review as well, but #unscientific.
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. TJP‏ @tjp81 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Reminds me of an XKCD: https://xkcd.com/451/ .
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. TJP‏ @tjp81 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  TJP Retweeted
  
  Information scientist review of an airfoil paper sought: https://twitter.com/no_reply/status/812105507859140608 ….
  
  TJP added,
  
  This Tweet is unavailable.
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Falcoshin Brandt‏ @RS_Falcoshin 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Would I be correct in assuming that modern peer-review is usually just two people agreeing on some preconceived conclusion?
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Tom Cobley-Hobbes‏ @HobbesianM 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  Non-peer review might be better. Put some mathematicians on the review panels for soc-sci journals & see what happens.
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. P.S. Real Talk ‏ @PSRealTalk 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  .@jordanbpeterson @pammustard sorta related: do you accept man-made climate change & evolution as acceptd by vast majority of field experts?
  
  3 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. E‏ @dairic 23 Dec 2016
  Replying to @jordanbpeterson
  
  @pammustard Peer review is very important in science&engineering. Of course reviewer needs qualifications. We're fallible
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. E‏ @dairic 23 Dec 2016
  Mathematicians, physicists, engineers, all drink the same koolaid. These are not ideological pursuits however.
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo