.@jordanbpeterson This reminds me of the "Fembot Collective" peer review group that @Sargon_of_Akkad made a video about
The "peer-reviewed" literature questioning biological sex isn't science. It's SJW opinion supported by SJWs. Peer-review ≠ science. https://twitter.com/westerspace/status/812354948679667712 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@jordanbpeterson every time you unironically use the phrase "SJW," you out yourself as a crackpot -
Why, it's shorter than postmodern nihilistic self-righteous authoritarian progressives
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why hasn't that been the substance of your disagreement? C-16 doesn't prevent you from rejecting amorphous gender ID.
-
Because main beef isn't with the gender issue. It's with gov't overreach and lessened standards of criminality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Likewise, nearly all the UofT professors who denounced you in that letter are from SocJus corrupted fields
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hence why social science studies have reproducability issues. Then reports of "science has a problem!" Madness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They don't want to do science. They want to win. Labeling beliefs they like "science" seemed a way to win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in other words, SJW science is a circlejerk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frederick Douglass Distinguished Scholarship Deadline varies http://usascholarships.com/frederick-douglass-distinguished-scholars-program/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.