Regardless of any document, that is a vague law because it allows the alleged offended party to define what is offensive
Bill C16: "gender identity/expression in context of hate propaganda prohibitions is not unconstitutionally vague" http://bit.ly/2heGAII
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So,
@Puglaas thinks "internal and individual experience of gender." & "how a person publicly presents their gender." isn't@jordanbpeterson -
unconstitutionally vague?!?!?!
@Puglaas@jordanbpeterson
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Kafkaesque in its vagueness and open to interpretation. Canadians deserve better - or not, having voted for
@JustinTrudeau.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but vague just the same. Also, fairly read, unconstitutional. Individual, not group rights.
#HateSpeech codes are wrong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.