may be illegal!?!?!?!?
Evidence for discrimination in mate/sex partner choice from evo psychologist Buss (warning: may be illegal): http://bit.ly/2fCwiCb
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Consistent male and female preferences in prospective mates, across 33 countries. The power of social construction! (/s)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MonteMcNaughton on Are poli's promoting sexual dysfunction? The PC's doing nothing...says everything!@brownbarrieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
God you're a whiner.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Already have progs stating that being forced2reveal HIV/AIDS status2a new sex partner is privacy violat'n
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A few thing stand out for me: 1. Underlying assumption that the nuclear family is the basic unit...what about kinship?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...maybe it does take a village to raise a child.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2. Woman are sexual beings too (chastity not as impt as assumed)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3. Bonding (and reproduction) not simply about fecundity -more complicated!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.