@scotthematics We can always seek comfort in vaguely descripted laws, can't we?
The article says that it's "unlikely" that anyone would be jailed. How reassuring.https://twitter.com/scotthematics/status/793566666340859904 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's "unlikely" until it happens. Vague laws are bad laws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really it shouldn't matter what the punishment is. Alongside a destroyed public rep, it's punishment for using words.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why are there so many parallels with what we are hearing as the Left tries to control speech with the words of the Nazis?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The guy from article is the same lawyer from the
@TheAgendaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I hit my character limit... I hate character limits. But yes, not using words. Thank you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed I agree 100%. Forced Speech is the polar opposite of Free Speech. Hey look we both have eyeball pic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@jordanbpeterson Suppose you're committed to refusing to accommodate your students. Any idiot can avoid using 3rd person in the classroom -
.
@jordanbpeterson For a supposed educator, the "right" to intentionally misgender/alienate your students is a weird hill to choose to die on - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.