will you continue the biblical series?
Yes. But wrongly. The research behind the big 5 model is more valid and reliable than almost everything else in psychological science. Throw it out on methodological grounds and almost everything else goes. With the possible exception of animal-focused behavioural neuroscience.https://twitter.com/notmwaa/status/1460791164219625472 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My psychology professor (who's amazing by the way, I'm not trying to disrespect her) criticizes Jung because she says his theories are hard to prove scientifically and were more like philosophy. What are your thoughts on that take?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I appreciate the reply Jordan. It’s the most grounded and researched framework for behavior/ personality, although I do believe less proven frameworks are also valuable in their own right. (I.e. jung, much of maslows work)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with you, however, intuitively I can recognize cognitive functions, identifying their type, I can then observe the big 5 traits like openness. Each individual is unique in big5 traits, yet share common functions in the way they process input. It's like seeing the matrix.
-
jung said the functions can change but yeah it's interesting, from what I've observed I think types seem to be born this way, perhaps it's patterns in the structure of the mind or to do with genes
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.