We can't fight Foucault by going back--we just can't. What we need to do is go all the way down the rabbit hole that he (and other Modernists) have opened. There are Catholic philosophers who are trying to do just that.
"Resemblance" must always be the form of knowledge, as categories contain the "same" things (and inevitably in relationship to a goal (known or unknown). Inescapably.pic.twitter.com/VevWgqXtaF
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait, wait, wait... I think this is true, but for the "always". Also a psychologist here. Will explain (feel free to antagonize): 1. Resemblance may adequately describe an element of stimulus induction (not "generalization"). What impinges similarly, evokes similar behavior. ok
-
We can call it tacit knowledge or whatever (but the notion of "unconscious knowledge" i think has to be taken as the useful metaphor it is... we act, without consciously knowing, in a way that resembles -no pun intended- what we do when we know stuff...)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.