That was Jung's question. And Foucault's. But it seems to me that their answers were diametrically opposed. And Camille Paglia agrees. And the modern academy went with Foucault. And here we are in our cynicism and discord.
Show this thread
This is true of all of us. From Foucault The Order of Things. But which book, most fundamentally? Since all stories have a similarity, which makes them "stories.".And which character, precisely? Since "character" exists as such.pic.twitter.com/odaYPrjfjC
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I prefer the
#Bitcoin
whitepaper, which just celebrated it's 13th birthday the other day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is so Platonic too. He has become an idea. Which I guess in turn branches in the Jungian archetype. I believe we all wander from flesh to an idea. We become spirit as our flesh gets rotten.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Everyone has a book in them. In most cases, that’s where it should stay” ~Christopher Hitchens
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Think our last prez was Foma Fovich
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.