As Jung knew re alchemy and the fantasies of alchemy. But Foucault leapt too fast to his conclusions re the difficulty of categorization. Unlike Jung.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read this out loud and nothing you wrote here made any sense.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Archetype and manifestation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you think about the theory of levels of awareness as a model for psychology and cognitive action? The principle of a higher level of awareness determining the quality of conscious thoughts.
-
A particular aspect is: the frequency of levels of awareness. Where a higher level of awareness can lead to a better psyche but only at high frequencies. This, separating high conscious activity in children in situations of stress and the general conscious activity of adults.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He’s commenting on Buffon who’s commenting on Aldrovandi in relation to what Foucault sees as caesura/rupture historical archeology/his methodology, right or wrong I consider a wonderful failure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What he said


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But, if you want "guaranteed" results...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What? Can you find a less asinine and reflexive critique? Foucault doesn't speak of the difficulty of categorisation, he talks of the historicity of categorisation. Your preferences in philosophy are irrelevant to the matter.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.