Not a randomized trial. Thus we cannot know how the 3rd dose group differed in variable demographic a priori health features that can only be controlled by randomization. A fatal flaw.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02249-2/fulltext …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fOlLow tHe SCiEnCe! Aka the polls
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel the problem often is that politicians don't understand the science, and the media thrives on huge headlines, which leads to the people getting the wrong information. The scientist have been clear that the vaccine does not stop the spread, but minimize the symptoms
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our standards for those metrics have been diminishing for some time now. Seems like every year the western world goes a little more mad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jordan - Israel had already begun administering the boosters to various groups in July and August. The policy-makers hadn't waited for the clear-cut science, they just did what seemed the most obvious to do and it worked. That's why these scientists couldn't run an RCT.
-
what do you mean by 'it worked'? considering the timeframe isn't it too early from a policy standpoint to draw such a conclusion?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You already told people to "get the damned vaccine." If you can endorse 2 doses, why not endorse a 3rd, a 4th etc? If they decline it then they took a risky gene therapy for nothing. They'll be reduced to the same outcast status as those of us who never took a single dose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.