If you'd like to watch more, click here:https://youtu.be/-6ZyQKiwMQw
Show this thread
"There are two things that every society needs to control: one is female fecundity because of its high cost, and the other is male aggression."
@robkhenderson and I discuss fecundity (the ability to produce an abundance of offspring), male aggression and monogamy.pic.twitter.com/kcfJydfy7E
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Time to update your philosophy Dr. Peterson... it's 2021 after all...
-
Seriously--what an embarrassing take. This is why I feel bad for the guy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dude--this is your cultural bias & not academic. There is no reasoning here. Male aggression thrives in monogamy, & on their offspring--regardless of marital or relationship status. This is some ideological clawback to comfort your bad take on relationship health. Disappointing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Maps of Meaning" introduced me to Jung's philosophy in such a deep and meaningful way. It gave me and my fiancé plenty to discuss as we spent last year reading through "The Red Book." Never doubt that you're doing great things in the life of everyday people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or as my physician wife says-government needs to put birth control in all public water supply…
-
At a time when most Western nations are reproducing below replacement values and global male fertility is dropping, her solution is to effectively sterilize every female, and dose every animal down to the embryo conceived yesterday with female hormones, with no one's consent?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What am I missing here? in humans, it is males, not females, that have high fecundity surely? Women can only produce 1 child a year, men can produce hundreds (if they have access to enough women). So the premise makes no sense?
-
What you’re missing is that in a monogamous relationship the woman is much less likely to conceive numerous potentially unwanted children in the absence of a dedicated caretaker — namely, her husband
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Society must control female fecundity...wtaf does that mean?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.