Tune in to our conversation on YouTube here:https://youtu.be/_OtZ49i-yyk
Show this thread
Is having the power of decision-making better when it's distributed across multiple tyrants instead of just one sole, central tyrant?
@BobMurphyEcon and I discuss this idea and what it entails in our podcast together.pic.twitter.com/QlMJxFXnS2
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When will Shaykh Hamza episode will be released?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The history of oligarchies would seem to indicate not
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better how? Multiple tyrants can have conflicting decisions, which allows cracks for the oppressed to slip through. Is that better?
-
Nope, next election I'm voting for the guy freezes monetary policies for 4 years and makes a budget then
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bitcoin fixes this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d like to think that your conversations with
@dergigi@rjames_BTC@johnkvallis@Breedlove22 about#bitcoin
and #cryptocurrencies were on your mind.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doc Lobster and Friends unwittingly making the case for libertarian socialism was not something I had on my 2021 bingo card but I'll take it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A question actually having no answer. And that’s why it is stupid. Anyway, according to Plato, there should be only one. Just he calles him a Monarch, not a Tyrant)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.