More I consider this podcast, the more my dislike for Krauss. Every interesting avenue of discussion Dr. Peterson brought up, Krauss scotched with some reductive shallowness (e.g., "the science tells us what our motivation should be...")
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
he said we wouldn’t need science without religious thinking. He didn’t say you have to hate religion to become a scientist.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The case for science in effect subconsciously and collectively can also be observed as a case for religion is interesting to me, I’ve never thought about it that way before.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"they didn't get the point because they're all woke", ahahahah.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This could use some edits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no method that can replace human judgment and accountability. The “scientific method” does nothing close to imbuing university professors with the equivalent of papal infallibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is the modern scientific method?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the scientific method is carried out by humans who are susceptible to political beliefs, peer pressure, clique behaviour and corporate interests, which can influence what research is funded, produced and published.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree. Just I would have changed the word "religious" for "spiritual"
-
Religious is the word associated with dogma..
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.