no they're not
-
-
-
Oh? Then what is the actual most reliable and valid measure method in social science?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We use Big 5 personality and IQ testing at
@MaximusTribe, which results in the most objective hiring process (and thus talented & naturally diverse teams). If you believe in meritocracy and working with A+ players, join us:https://angel.co/company/maximustribe … -
Excellent!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1) The problem I have with them is that I don’t chart particularly high on them yet I don’t really find myself to be a dull person. In the right circumstances I often find myself ahead of the pack in say something like a social setting. I can make people laugh and be engaging.
-
2) To me that seems like it requires a certain measure of intelligence to be able to do. But it’s not clear to me that this specific kind of intelligence is taken into account by something like an IQ test. What does it say for people that do great in a room but bad on paper?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So many scientists reject IQ tests as being a good measure of intelligence that it makes it hard to know if that statement is factual.
-
I think he puts it well, it’s not super good, but it’s easily the best we have, by far
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That is a lot like a navigator boasting that a compass that shows correctly only half of the cardinal points is his "best tool": it might be literally true, but I wouldn't boast about it...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That IQ is the "most reliable" says quite something about the overall reliability of "social sciences", then :)https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.