You're a race traitor ;)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do they?
End of conversation
-
-
-
foucault does not define truth as “what is,” defined in the article as Truth1. he thinks truth is a ‘regimen’ used by the people in power to justify punishment. he’s not making a statement about “what is.” he’s making a statement about social control
-
Yes, the piece explained Foucault’s truth, labeled Truth2. It then goes on to explain the contradiction in that definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Honest question: do you think there's a possibiilty that Foucault wrote and said all his stuff without taking anything about himself very seriously, just rattling off ideas? I'm reading "Histoire de la folie" and a few of his ideas are interesting. Is he really worth loathing?
-
Btw working on finishing my debut novel + manifesto, will be dedicating it to you and I'll send you a copy somehow
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's the best summation ever, John!
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He is not a relativist. He just concedes that it is not possible to know what is true better than in a pragmatic manner, because of the interpreter conundrum.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.