It's as reliable as a polygraph to tell if someones lying. Aka its very poor
Yes, these are all badly misleading and have produced seriously counterproductive social and political consequences. We could add whole word learning, self esteem training and positive illusions.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1099809302506758144 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Learning styles is definitely useful, if only based on preference and attention. Maybe not in large classrooms, but in one on one tutoring settings definitely. Kinesthetic learning especially versus audio/visual.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure how you can debunk multiple intelligences. Please elaborate.
-
Google it. Basically there's a whole host of issues with it and most serious academics and programs recognize it as problematic (except in education). I'm getting an MS in instructional design and I have my teaching credential, so I've gotten it on both sides (cont)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When people speak of 'multiple intelligences', aren't they referring to brain function in areas other than cognitive ability? Seems legit to me.
-
I believe the multiple intelligences theory suggests there’s a musical intelligence, kinesthetic intelligence.. where Peterson would suggest (if I’m not misunderstanding) that these are skills like being good at dancing. Intelligence is a separate and measurable thing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
NLP Is a wrong idea in psychology? That's surprising for me! How come? Will you tell me a bit of it?
-
As far as I know there are no studies that proved nlp to be any more effective than common self development strategies. And some aspects of nlp might have been disproven. There's a paper called '35 years of research on nlp' or sth like that which talks about how scientific nlp is
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isnt there multiple intelligences though? Given that people can be intelligent in many ways? Mathematically, linguistically, musically e.t.c
-
Many of the “intelligences” in Gardner’s theory just aren’t measurable. But as for what is measurable, there is a strong positive correlation between them. This correlation is what psychometricians call the general intelligence factor. This will help: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics) …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.