On other news. Dr Peterson. Your subreddit has reached 100,000 followers or subscribers if you will.
Unequal outcomes do not prove arbitrary discrimination and should NOT be used as such proofhttp://j.mp/2QEKm06
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
On average more Chinese love gambling; more Indians love cricket; more women watch soap operas; more Brits like sarcasm etc ad nauseam. SO WHAT? I thought diversity was strength? What would equal outcomes achieve anyway? Why force women to work fixing computers if most hate it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are SO deep, bro.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
What on earth would equal outcomes achieve anyway? Forcing women to fix computers even though they might hate it sounds like tyranny to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well then, I need to go back to UC Berkeley because that fundamental belief was behind everything they taught me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consequences of public policy should not feed back into the creation of public policy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.