That's alarming
"Google’s search engine—with/without deliberate planning by Google—currently determines the outcome of 25% of world national elections … the search engine lacks any kind of equal-time rule, so it virtually always favors one candidate over another.”http://j.mp/2RUOKol
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait, I thought equality of search engine outcome was a bad thing ...
-
He never said that... It's fairly obvious that not all "equalities of outcome" are created equal, so to speak.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Regulate google?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Exactly! Wait, what did you say?
End of conversation
-
-
-
And trump STILL got elected. Imagine if the media was actually objective.
-
Trump wouldn’t have been elected?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Looks like we need to regulate the media. WHo'd a thunk it? I seem to remember there were some who warned us about this during the triumphalist 90s and aughts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.