A paper from 2004 warning (completely unsuccessfully) about the death of research by red tape:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
One once-optimistic researcher's ethics committee nightmare: http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/29/my-irb-nightmare/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tells me they're further from understanding the subject than they even realized
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hilarious recap of a 2-year battle to get a study on a bipolar screening test *already in widespread use* approved (spoiler: nope): http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/29/my-irb-nightmare/ …pic.twitter.com/R8hr4V6GJu
-
I think the committee are all bipolar.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Any progress on the creation of an alternative higher education certificate program?
-
Yeah, when will it be ready? I look forward to literally dozens of people explaining it at job interviews to people who neither know nor care about it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Suppose a private organization in the US or Canada wants to do research. Does anything compel them to participate in any of this heavy processes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Too far. Ethics are obviously important. Some research was cruel, especially in psych. I conducted research about psych injury. Had to have professionals on hand in case of flashbacks. I argued impractical esp if interviewed in their homes. Finally got approval. 100% in home
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.