Peterson has built the most complex intellectual scaffolding seen since the Jesuits to conceal from himself (and others) that this is so.
"Infants expected the protagonists to continue to obey the leader’s order after she left the scene, but they expected the protagonists to obey the bully’s order only when she remained present."http://j.mp/2oPH6ik
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Ah yeah, I just read about that in
@JonHaidt's The Righteous Mind (if that's the same study). Interesting. -
Hmm that can't be the same study if it's that new. Still - that'd confirm the earlier study.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...and in this case paid them $$!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, an innate distinction? Raises the question of whether other species also can distinguish between hierarchy and bullying. Probably not lobsters.
-
I would guess most of them do where bullying is even a thing. Worker ants appear to know their place.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fascinating. Even babies can tell who the bully is..
-
Clearly this debunks the entirety of socialism. Because of course it does.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for posting this. In context of
#NYTopEd its been fascinating to watch the#bullying even of top#TrumpCabinet officials forced to deny it was them. Not one has even dared to say that the@VP has a duty under#amendment25 to keep an eye on POTUS’s mental health!#shitshowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.