I’m sure incrementalism works for the privileged, but the privileged are not my concern.
Yes. How about we do exactly that. And thank our lucky stars we're not starving and diseased.https://twitter.com/KarlKohlhase/status/1023998358845829121 …
-
-
-
If your concern is raising the standard of living for the mass in poverty, the best approach is capitalism. Regardless of its stated goals, Communism only concentrates the privileged and starves the masses.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Who is starving? Are you talking about Canada or zimbabwe?
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Great idea , we could call it democracy
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A foundation based on the bible will always be sexist, bigoted, anti-LGBT and generally anti-personal freedom. Incremental or radical; the traditionalist, male-supremacist tyranny of Abrahamic religion must go - and one day we *will* be free of it.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The problem with democracy is that the people inside it (who makes all the decisions) are dynamic and constantly in flux. Something that seems good to you today may be awful the next day even without new information added. Eg. what kind of food you want to eat.
-
Therefore a benevolent dictatorship is actually the most efficient and best form of government. However we cannot ensure that a dictator, once granted power, will remain benevolent. Therefore the only logical conclusion is to have a dictator who isn't dynamic like an AI.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.