I definitely agree with you, but am curious if you would think of there is a distinction between willing volunteers and forced participants?
Then, if it involves human or animal subjects, they have to pass it through a painfully slow and paranoiac ethics committee which will feel duty bound to object to some triviality, enervating the already demoralized researcher entirely...https://twitter.com/timothycbates/status/1014469377587122177 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Tuskegee
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What changes would you suggest should be made to the ethics committee process to make it quicker (and ideally, more effective)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The trick is to insert some ethically questionable part that can be easily and painlessly removed to satisfy the committee but only after a suitable amount of faux-consternation. Add 20% to the budget estimate too, to accommodate cost-reduction demands...
-
Is Andrew Rabbitt your real name? If so, congrats, great handle! If we were friends, the nicknames would be epic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It should be this easy: Doc: my intuition tells me this may be beneficial to humans. "Hey Doc, subject ME to the Clinical trials." Doc: Sign here _xx_. Alright, let's improve mankind and maybe kill or harm me in the process, but we all agree on that going in! :)
-
I agree in principal but I wonder where funding comes from? Anyone should be able to volunteer for a trial but I fear the funding source.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, quit pestering Dr. Mengele.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.