That perfection doesn't exist in human endeavors, so any scheme will be flawed?
There is no better way of hedging against prejudice than the best objective tests. They are simply less flawed than all other (necessarily flawed) assessment methods.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1001973210819252224 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Please, dudes, get together. Humanity, or at least your respective audiences, will benefit from a public discussion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These tests are not objective, not by a long shot. Measuring the value of people on IQ is exceedingly faulty, shallow and self-serving. How convenient for you to claim what's false to be true.
-
How accurate is unconscious bias testing? Just asking.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Meritocracy vs. Autocracy
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That article was only about test scores, not IQ (until i quit reading). Test scores and grades are a farce. Harvard knew for 60+ years best grades do not equal success. Strong extra curricular and solid Bs succeed more and give back more in $$ than 4.0s.
-
Cheating is also a massive problem. I didnt know until 4th year profs were giving away final exam Qs before the test and road maps for assignments were everywhere. I learned everything the old fashioned way which gave me killer insight for actual engineering but my grades sucked
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The only problem I have with IQ tests is language based questions. When in school I commonly found semi-obscure words I had not been taught or been exposed to at all. Not forgotten, but never seen, even as an avid reader. That's not a test of intelligence, but of exposure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.