jonathan levin

@jony_levin @SHodyEsq always love a good UCC conspiracy theory :) @epaymentslawyer has pushing this argument for years now...

@virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer is there another counter argument apart from the Perkins suggestion of a trust company ?

@jony_levin @virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer Counter argument is "deniability of ownership" enforced via privacy-enhancing protocols

@jonmatonis @jony_levin @virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer Other solution: Only do business across UCC jurisdictional boundary.

@JustusRanvier @jonmatonis @jony_levin @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer you don’t need solution(s) for non-problems :) nemo dat is a red herring

@virtuallylaw @JustusRanvier @jonmatonis @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer #bitcoin intangible property? If so doesn’t nemo dat follow?#notalawyer

@jony_levin @JustusRanvier @jonmatonis @SHodyEsq @epaymentslawyer nemo dat not relevant, true owner of BTC is bearer of private key

@jony_levin @virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq this issue may come up in other jurisdictions as well @bramanathan

@milescowan @jony_levin @virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq @bramanathan It absolutely does come up in other jurisdictions.

@bitcoinlawyer @jony_levin @virtuallylaw @SHodyEsq @bramanathan this will make for some conflict of laws analysis!

@milescowan @bitcoinlawyer @jony_levin @SHodyEsq @bramanathan things get real when you enter into an agreement (not Smart K) encumbering btc

@virtuallylaw @bitcoinlawyer @jony_levin @SHodyEsq @bramanathan the chance that that hasn't already happened has got to be close to nil

@virtuallylaw @bitcoinlawyer @jony_levin @SHodyEsq @bramanathan blanket liens are extremely common in huge variety of financing arrangementa

@milescowan @bitcoinlawyer @jony_levin @SHodyEsq @bramanathan reversing trxs on the blockchain is not a valid remedy, courts are pragmatic