1/ Durham Police official statement about #cummings : "Durham Constabulary have examined the circumstances surrounding the journey to Barnard Castle ... and have concluded that there might have been a minor breach of the Regulations that would have warranted police intervention.
-
-
/6 The section of the statement in Tweets 1-5 relate to the journey to Barnard Castle. Durham Police also talk about Mr Cumming's initial journey to Durham from London on March 27 ...
Deze collectie tonen -
/7 "Durham Constabulary does not consider that by locating himself at his father’s premises, Mr Cummings committed an offence contrary to regulation 6 of the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020.
Deze collectie tonen -
/8 " (We are concerned here with breaches of the Regulations, not the general Government guidance to “stay at home”.)"
Deze collectie tonen -
/9 Durham Police also say "Finally, commentary in the media has suggested that Mr Cummings was in Durham on 19 April 2020. Mr Cummings denies this and Durham Constabulary have seen insufficient evidence to support this allegation."
Deze collectie tonen -
/10 to sum up - going to Durham apparently didn't constitute an offence (police stress they only care about offences, not ignoring general guidance) but visit to Barnard Castle "might have been a minor breach of the Regulations that would have warranted police intervention"
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
- Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
- Antwoorden weergeven
-
-
-
The irony of it all
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.