-
-
Als antwoord op @jonnycope
.
@jonnycope didn't he order them to vote against lobbing cruise missiles at the Syrian people?1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tomblackuk
@tomblackuk No, against 'the possibility' of military action. Basically a vote to allow chemical attacks to go completely unpunished.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @jonnycope
@jonnycope rather low of you to twist the facts. It was a vote against an open-ended 'possibility' not a vote FOR never taking action.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tomblackuk
@jonnycope voting against a blank cheque is not equivalent to voting to block any action against a regime. Just against the blank cheque.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tomblackuk
@tomblackuk See third and last paragraphs. http://www.itv.com/news/2013-08-28/the-full-text-of-the-governments-motion-on-syria/ …4 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @jonnycope
@jonnycope thank you. Reassures me that I was remembering correctly - the vote was taken before any evidence was in, and rightly rejected.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @tomblackuk
@tomblackuk You said it was a 'blank cheque', clearly it wasn't. Presume you think we should have voted again after evidence then?2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @jonnycope
@jonnycope on 'voting again after evidence', it was Cameron who ruled that out, not Miliband - I watched him say it in the House after vote.4 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
@tomblackuk 'Before any direct British involvement in such action a further vote of the House of Commons will take place.' - Govt Motion
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.